You are here » CORE INFO » Reviews » Fractures » What radiological investigations should be performed to identify fractures in suspected child abuse? » Which children with suspected abuse should be investigated for occult fractures? » Results

Results

Of 490 studies reviewed, ten studies addressed which children should be investigated for occult fractures when child abuse is suspected 1-10

  • Study design:
    • 3 case series 1,2,5
    • 6 cross-sectional 3,4,6-9
    • 1 uncontrolled before and after study 10
  • Total data: 3587 children who had skeletal survey (SS)
  • Age range: 0 – 16 years (1110 less than one year old, where data available)
  • Gender: the rate of positive SS was not analysed by gender

 

Influence of ethnicity and socio-economic group

  • African/American infants with unwitnessed head injury were more likely to have a SS than white infants (90.5% v 69.3%, p=0.01) 10
  • White children with private insurance were much less likely to have a SS than white children with no insurance/government insurance (50% v 88%, p<0.001) 10
  • Introduction of a screening guideline reduced the inequities in SS conducted in white versus African/American children (rates of SS in white children increased from 69.3% to 84.6%, (p=0.05) but stayed the same among African/American children) 10

 

Details of included studies

Influence of age on fracture detection

  • The diagnostic yield from SS correlates inversely with age and is significant for children under two years of age1-4,6,8,9
  • The rate of occult fractures detected in children aged less than two years in two large-scale studies was 11% 3, 13% 7
  • There is a higher diagnostic rate for SS in children under six months than in those aged two years and six months  3
  • One study showed no difference in the yield of occult findings on SS in those aged less than one year (23% positive, 95% confidence interval (CI) 18, 28) and those aged one – two years (19% positive 95% CI 11, 29), p=0.45 5
  • Significantly more rib fractures and classical metaphyseal lesions were found in children aged less than one year than those aged one – two years 5
  • 14/17 (82%) of positive SS were in children less than one year of age 2
  • 14/55 (25%) of children aged less than one year had positive SS 2
  • Only 2/7 (29%) of children aged between one and two years had positive SS (personal correspondence) 2
  • Six skeletal surveys were performed on siblings (< three years old) of children with abuse. SS was positive in one sibling 2

 

Indications for SS

  • 14% of children with abusive burns had occult fractures identified on SS 6
  • Mean age of children with positive SS and burns was older than non-burns cases (p=0.03) 6


  • 29% of infants aged less than one year with an unwitnessed head injury had positive findings on SS warranting child protection investigations 10
  • If the injury severity score was >15, cases were more likely to have positive findings than those with lower scores (OR 3.4, p<0.01) 10
  • Abusive head trauma (AHT) was significantly associated with a positive SS (P<0.00) 3


  • Children presenting with apparent life threatening event (ALTE) / apnoea had a higher rate of positive SS than those presenting for other reasons (p=0.05) 3
  • Children presenting with seizure had a higher rate of positive SS than those presenting for other reasons (p=0.02) 3


  • Three children presenting with an isolate skull fracture and no other signs of abuse had a positive SS 3

 

Click here to open

References

  1. Belfer RA, Klein BL, Orr L. Use of the skeletal survey in the evaluation of child maltreatment. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2001;19(2):122-124 [Pubmed]
  2. Day F, Clegg S, McPhillips M, Mok J. A retrospective case series of skeletal surveys in children with suspected non-accidental injury. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine. 2006;13(2):55-59 [Pubmed]
  3. Duffy SO, Squires J, Fromkin JB, Berger RP. Use of skeletal surveys to evaluate for physical abuse: analysis of 703 consecutive skeletal surveys. Pediatrics. 2011;127(1):e47-e52 [Pubmed]
  4. Ellerstein NS, Norris KJ. Value of radiologic skeletal survey in assessment of abused children. Pediatrics 1984;74(6):1075-1078 [Pubmed]
  5. Hansen KK, Campbell KA. How useful are skeletal surveys in the second year of life? Child Abuse and Neglect. 2009;33(5):278-281 [Pubmed citation only]
  6. Hicks RA, Stolfi A. Skeletal surveys in children with burns caused by child abuse. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2007;23(5):308-313 [Pubmed]
  7. Karmazyn B, Lewis ME, Jennings SG, Hibbard RA, Hicks RA. The prevalence of uncommon fractures on skeletal surveys performed to evaluate for suspected abuse in 930 children: should practice guidelines change? American Journal of Roentgenology. 2011;197(1):W159-W163 [Pubmed]
  8. Leventhal JM, Thomas SA, Rosenfield NS, Markowitz RI. Fractures in young children. Distinguishing child abuse from unintentional injuries. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1993;147(1):87-92 [Pubmed]
  9. Merten DF, Radlowski MA, Leonidas JC. The abused child: a radiological reappraisal. Radiology. 1983;146(2):377-381 [Pubmed]
  10. Rangel EL, Cook BS, Bennett BL, Shebesta K, Ying J, Falcone RA. Eliminating disparity in evaluation for abuse in infants with head injury: use of a screening guideline. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2009;44(6):1229-1234; discussion 1234-5 [Pubmed]

 

^ back to top